A great many of my friends and family are confirmed Christmas nay-sayers, citing primarily its commercial aspect, its religious dimension (or the lack of it), its hyped-up artificiality . . . Etc. I tend to agree with their criticisms and complaints, but reach my own conclusions, and my own solutions.
Shunning the glitzy aspect of Christmas as completely as possible, I try to avoid commercial radio, television, and shopping malls during the month of December, and seek refuge in the still recesses of the house: curled up on the couch under a blanket, beside fireplace and illuminated tree, fortifying myself against the contemporary world with egg nog, rum and a stack of worthy old books.
Moreover, as Marian & I count Christmas as the true first day (with eleven to come) of the Christmas season, rather than the last, we mostly have our Christmas when, by the rest of the world, it has already been forgotten.
We take daily walks with our Scotty, have the occasional quiet meal out, dine in the houses of our friends and, all in all, keep a subdued Christmas, with major emphasis on food, drink, English traditions and, of course, books, books and more books. (We have approximately 10,000 mostly hardcover books in our home, from basement to attic, filling floor-to-ceiling bookcases in every room, and not a Kindle or Nook among them).
First and foremost, of course, is Dickens’s A Christmas Carol. I would like to say that we own an 1843 Chapman & Hall edition, illustrated by John Leech and designed by Dickens himself– for that would be the preferred way to read it– where not only the language but the physical presence of the book itself, right down to the faint whiff of old dust and the smattering of foxing on the fine old linen paper, are redolent of the time and place where the story originated, the long-ago and long-since-vanished world of early Victorian London.
A library should be full of such volumes, books as old as their authors, and ours has its share– including a two-volume 1852 edition of David Copperfield in half-leather– but The Christmas Carol is a special case, and if we actually owned one we would doubtless have to keep it under lock & key. So we make do with later (much later) editions.
A excellent choice is a volume from the Oxford Illustrated Dickens series, which is small enough to fit the hand easily, and thus nicely adapted to reading in bed. It comes together with Dickens’ other Christmas tales, and is entitled simply Christmas Books. It has the original illustrations by John Leech (with the other stories illustrated by their respective original artists), and a new introduction by Eleanor Farjeon.
The perfect companion volume to A Christmas Carol is The Man Who Invented Christmas: How Charles Dickens’ s A Christmas Carol Rescued His Career and Revived Our Holiday Spirits. Described by its author, Les Standiford, as “a fireside pleasure of the Fezziwigian type, and not a formal work of scholarship”, I found the style sufficiently light and enlivened to read through the whole book in a sitting, though I suspect that, as a work of scholarship, it will bear scrutiny. It is not only a history of Dickens and his book, and the reception it received, and a consideration of its considerable influence, but a deeply thoughtful meditation on the nature of Christmas as well.
Behind all of Dickens, and close to essential meaning of Christmas, is the squalid reality of London poverty in the early decades of the Industrial Revolution. I have several books which I return to off and on throughout the year, but which I dwell upon especially during the Christmas season.
Top of the list are the several chronicles of the London poor published by the journalist Henry Mayhew in the 1850s and ’60s: London Labour & the London Poor; The Criminal Prisons of London and London’s Underworld. Mayhew had a gift for winning the confidence of the desperate and destitute, and of persuading them to speak freely of their lives and circumstances, and the personal accounts that he put into his books were a shock and a revelation to his readers at the time, and to this day.
His books are now considered classics and, as such, merit presentation in expensive editions such as that put forth by the Folio Society: London Characters and Crooks, which is a selection from several Mayhew titles, and is illustrated by the superb Woodburytype plates of John Thompson, from his Street Life in London, published in 1877-8.
A recent study of the 19th century London dark side is Kellow Chesney’s Pickpockets, Beggars & Ratcatchers, Life in the Victorian Underworld, which not only examines Henry Mayhew’s works in depth, but casts a wide net over contemporary first-hand accounts and early
sociological and criminology studies dating back to the 1830s, to dredge up detailed portraits of navvies, costermongers, tinkers, gypsies, chimney sweeps, pickpockets, forgers, footpads, burglars, housebreakers, cracksmen, confidence men, bookies, gonophs, beggars, and many others. A most helpful glossary of colloquial and cant words is provided.
For a visual tour of the back streets of 19th century London there is no finer guide than Gustave Dore who published his London portfolio of 180 drawings in the early 1870s. I recommend the inexpensive Dover edition: Dore’s London: All 180 Illustrations from London, A Pilgrimage.
Roughly half the drawings are of the upper crust and what strikes one most about these is how more or less identical everyone looks, all dressed in much the same way and comporting themselves according to the tightly defined strictures of their class. Of greater interest are the far more individualistic styles of the street people, captured in all their idiosyncratic variety and detail by Dore’s uncanny eye.
For an in-depth study of poverty in England during the dawn of the Industrial Age, the finest study is undoubtedly Gertrude Himmelfarb’s The Idea of Poverty in the Early Industrial Age. It examines the idea of poverty in the writings of Adam Smith, Edmund Burke, Jeremy Bentham, Thomas Paine, Malthus, Carlyle, Cobbett, Engels, Mayhew and others, as well as how the idea of poverty is presented in the literary works of Dickens, Ainsworth, Thackery, and Reynolds.
Himmelfarb suggests no clear villians or heroes, and offers no clear answers about the causes or cures of poverty. The more poverty is examined, the more complex and contradictory it becomes. Yet for answering the question of how or whether the Industrial Revolution exacerbated the problem of poverty in England, or even created an entire new class of the poor, Himmelfarb’s study is indispensable. I have returned to it numerous times over the years, and study it especially at Christmas.
Finally, I came across an apropos title online a few days ago which I immediately ordered: Dickens & the Street Children of London by Andrea Warren. I expect to read it straight through once it arrives, which should be any day now.

For the past several Christmases I have developed an idea of a cycle of sonnets, each portraying a particular London street person from the 1840s. This Christmas I completed the first of what I hope will be many, entitled “A Widow in Rosemary Lane“.




























